
Southern Connecticut State University strives to provide a safe, supportive, and welcoming community for all students to prosper. We stand firmly against any act that could inhibit the growth of others and are united to stand-up against and eliminate hazing. The Violence Prevention, Victim Advocacy, and Support Center (VPAS) provides prevention education on hazing; including an emphasis on ways to be an active bystander and stop it, as well as advocacy and support services for students. We hope to empower students to overcome obstacles and promote growth both inside and outside of the classroom.
Definition: Hazing is any activity expected of someone joining or participating in a group that humiliates, degrades, abuses, or endangers them regardless of a person’s willingness to participate.
Three key components of this definition include:
1.) Group context: Associated with the process for joining and maintaining membership in a group
2) Abusive behavior: Activities that are potentially humiliating and degrading, with the potential to cause physical, psychological, and/or emotional harm
3) Regardless of an individual’s willingness to participate: The “choice” to participate may be offset by the peer pressure and coercive/power dynamics that often exist in the context of gaining membership in a group.
Statistics: 55% of college students involved in clubs, teams, and organizations experience hazing. Hazing occurs in a wide range of organizations, with highest numbers for varsity athletics, fraternities/sororities, club sports, and performing arts clubs.
Some behaviors may be harder to define as hazing (e.g. it’s easier to define hazing that includes physical harm, but harder when participants are “willing” or “choose” to participate or when the harm is hidden, psychological, or emotional).
Some examples of hazing include
The degree of potential harm from hazing may be measured relative to particular behavior. Some students have lost their lives as a result of hazing. Some student hazing victims want to leave campus or choose to transfer institutions. Many hazing victims feel confused, upset, or isolated but don’t feel comfortable speaking out. They also talk about wishing they had support in changing some of the behaviors they were seeing on their campus. Some students who experience or observe hazing feel guilty, even when the hazing isn’t their fault.
Other negative effects of hazing include:
Some barriers reported by hazing scholars include:
In a 2008 study, 69% of students who belonged to a student group reported that they were aware of hazing activities occurring in student organizations other than their own. This means that oftentimes students may know hazing is occurring within an organization, but are unsure of what they can do to change it.
Learning about what members feel about hazing is critical to acquiring accurate perceptions of peers’ actual beliefs and values related to hazing. Research suggests that students often misperceive the extent to which their peers are comfortable engaging in high risk behaviors like hazing and that if they thought that a majority of their peers were uncomfortable with hazing, they would be more likely to decline to participate
Here are a few other ways students can make a difference:
Many hazing activities are planned in advance. Having conversations with members and friends about definitions of hazing and types of hazing behaviors may help others to “think twice” about what’s happening. Talking about hazing can broaden awareness of hazing, help others to notice it, and also contribute to making it less covert.
There are a few critical steps bystanders can take to address hazing on campus.
Create new and positive traditions with your team or organization that encourage, empower and bond each other. Some ideas include:
Hazing is not acceptable at SCSU. It is a violation of the Student Code of Conduct and against Connecticut State Law;
Information retrieved from CleryCenter.org.